Tesla’s autopilot already pushes the boundaries of machine decision-making—sometimes in ways that spark more questions than answers. But what if it didn’t just assist with driving? What if it started making everyday choices on your behalf?

Imagine this: Your Tesla isn’t just a car; it’s a proactive health assistant. Through biosignal technology, it detects a dip in your blood sugar and, without waiting for your input, seamlessly navigates to the nearest drive-through. You didn’t ask for a snack. You didn’t even realize you needed one. But your car decided for you.

Convenient? Maybe. Creepy? Absolutely.

The Behavioral Science Behind It

Decision fatigue is real. In a world where our devices anticipate our needs better than we do, manual decision-making can start to feel like unnecessary friction. The easier an option is, the more likely we are to take it—especially when we’re running on autopilot ourselves.

A Nuanced Take

But handing over even more control to an already autonomous system? That’s where things get murky. At what point does convenience become control? And when does helpful automation start making choices we never agreed to?

For now, this is just a dystopian thought experiment. But as tech keeps inching toward full automation, it’s worth asking: Where should we actually draw the line?